|
AV's Q & A with Tom Eaton |
|
Tom Eaton
Albums Tom shaped the
Positano Songs
Dreaming Northern
Seven Conversations
|
Whether he’s shaping arrangements, refining dynamics, or simply creating the space for a performance to breathe, his fingerprints are there in ways that don’t call attention to themselves, but are impossible to ignore once you know where to listen. This interview offers a rare look into that world—the unseen architecture behind the music, and the craftsman who helps bring it into focus.
AV: You are often the "invisible hand" behind some of the most beautiful records in the genre. How do you define your role when you step into the studio to work on someone else's project? TE: That can vary quite a bit, depending on how solid the music coming in feels to me. Sometimes just commenting on tempo or dynamics is enough to help someone find a more dramatic take of the song and other times there are structural things that can be helpful in terms of arrangement that I might bring up. Always I'm thinking about what it’s going to sound like at the end. Basically my job is to try and get the best art from the artist that I can get out of them on that day. In the initial stages, it's usually really helpful to try to connect the artist with the emotion that brought the song on in the first place, and usually that helps get a more emotional performance, which is what we base all the further work on. It's easy to get focused on “playing it right” at the expense of playing it in a way that engages the listener. AV: Working at a legendary space like Imaginary Roads with Will Ackerman carries a certain weight. How do you balance the "Will Ackerman sound" with your own modern production sensibilities?
TE: That's probably a different answer for every album! Some artists have the album concept fully formed before they walk in the studio, others come in with some material finished and work on improvisation while in the studio, and then other albums, I'm actively engaged in structuring the material. Ideally, I know what's coming before we are trying to record things because an idea that everyone can acknowledge is a good idea can be hard to pull off in the moment if the artist hasn't had time to process it and put it into muscle memory. AV: Do you find yourself playing the role of a "musical therapist" at times, helping artists overcome their insecurities or creative blocks during a session? TE: For sure. Thankfully everyone I work with is amazing at what they do… but we definitely hit road blocks occasionally and we have to figure out how to work around them. Sometimes that therapist role relates to what I spoke about earlier, which is trying to get the artist back to the emotional moment where the song emerged in the first place. After playing a piece for a long time, people can detach from the initial spark. AV: You are an accomplished multi-instrumentalist. How do you decide when a track needs your musical input (like a bass line or a piano part) versus when it needs to be left alone? TE: The music seems to ask for what it wants. Sometimes things want to be bigger or more mysterious or have more harmonies going on and depending on what the music seems to be asking for I'll try to pick up the right instrument. There are definitely cases where people ask me to play specific instruments and also situations where I'm left to my own devices. I do try to be careful with synthetic sounds because so many of the albums I'm working on are very acoustic
and so I try to keep
the secondary sounds in that world. I just finished an album for AV: Is there a specific "Tom Eaton signature" that you find yourself bringing to every project, regardless of the genre or the artist? TE: That's a good question and I hope that each record has its own unique identity based on the artist and where they're coming from, but I also hope that the arrangements are always clear and that every part can be heard. The players that we work with are so good that part of my job is making mixes and masters that honor all the art and heart that people are putting into the music. When I make long form ambient music, I enjoy textural ambiguity, but I don't typically subject other people to that when I'm producing or engineering records. AV: How do you handle a situation where your artistic instincts as a producer conflict with the artist's original vision?
TE: A huge part of that is having your eye on quality from before you push record. Making sure things are in tune goes a long way! Really good arrangements help as well. All the overdubs are pretty well planned out on most of these records, we know where we want what instrument to come in and go out and more or less the vibe they'd be playing in that time which helps a ton in terms of efficiency. And we work with players who are pretty bulletproof like Charlie Bisharat, Eugene Friesen, Premik Tubbs, Jeff Haynes, Jeff Oster, Jill Haley, Tony Levin and Michael Manring. They are all instantly brilliant and have both the technical chops and the emotional depth to get right to what a song needs. They are just the best at what they do which means things get done quickly AND brilliantly. AV: What is your philosophy on using modern digital tools versus vintage analog gear when trying to capture an "organic" or "timeless" sound? TE: We have to start and end analog usually but in the middle, it's all digital, which works amazingly well. As with anything I try to use the right tools for the job, but I am flexible enough to know when to try a different approach. I'm not a purist about any particular thing in terms of audio I just try to craft the best and most immersive music that I can using whatever tools I have at my disposal. If I'm a nerd about any gear things, it's actually speakers. I'm lost without a great set of monitors. AV: You’ve worked with a wide range of personalities. How do you adapt your communication style to get the best performance out of different types of musicians? TE: I'm not sure I do adapt that way. I have a pretty mellow temperament, which is always part of the equation. I'm sort of stupidly patient which is good I suppose when you're in search of quality that's beyond the average. I am out of my depth in a music theory conversation with someone like Eugene but usually if I sing something that resembles an idea that I have he can pull it off quite easily because he's brilliant. So it might be that many of the musicians I work with adapt their communication styles to me! Ha ha…
It's more of a head place. I'm all about the heart and making the connection between the music and the emotion as direct as possible. I'm not a great fit for music with a lot of note density or that is overly dissonant. To some degree that Music avoids me simply by nature of my track record. AV: Can you describe the physical and mental environment you try to create at your own studio, Sounds & Substance, to make artists feel at home? TE: This is my fourth studio space since 1993 and each one has gotten to reflect more and more of my sensibilities aesthetically. And ideally people who dig that aesthetic will feel at home here and I'll be a good match for. Historically that has been pretty reliable. If the vibe of my space isn't a good fit for somebody it's unlikely that I'm a good fit for them! The other aspect of the physical environment here is really just about monitoring accuracy. The room is designed to help the speakers perform well, and that that's massively important to me. AV: What are the common technical mistakes you see independent artists making before they get into the studio with a professional? TE: Caring too much about how the demo sounds. Spending too much time researching gear rather than writing good songs or improving songs that are already in progress. And not so much technical maybe in the way you mean it but there is a reason that popular music has such structure to it and I embrace that whenever I can… verses and choruses and bridges are tried and tested tools in making music that connects with people. I'm all about great structures in music that should be structured! I'm also all about micro variations in that if a section of a song repeats, I think there should be some variation in the repetition. It can be one note it can be a ritard, or a dynamic shift, but something that re-engages the listener.
AV: When a project is finished, how do you transition from being a "collaborator" back to being a "fan" of the music you just helped create? TE: That can take a while! Usually, I think about it as ”healing” where the many micro decisions made along the way start to vanish from my memory. At some point, I can hear the music as a listener, although I never have the experience of hearing a complete production for the first time which is interesting because that's the exact experience I'm delivering to the world. AV: Who were the producers or engineers who influenced your "behind the glass" philosophy early in your career? TE: Kevin Killen is a brilliant engineer, and I studied his records for years. He makes everything so clear and so tangible. I just love his work. When I first started making records, I took clients to Jonathan.Wyner at M WORKS MASTERING in Cambridge, MA. Jonathan is so good at what he does and I learned a tremendous amount watching and listening to him master my work.
So each album is something I have cared for along the way and have gotten pretty involved with. At the end of the day, it's the artist’s celebration, and the goal is simply to help them make art that is the best that they can make. AV: In an era where technology can generate mathematically perfect music, there is a growing conversation about the 'soul' of a recording. How do you, as a producer, facilitate that 'creative transfer' where a piece of the artist’s humanity actually survives the journey through cables, converters, and software? How do you help them leave a 'ghost' in the machine? TE: Sometimes for my own sanity, I draw a line between functional music and art music. If someone needs to relax and finds a piece of AI content gets them there, that has to be OK… however I'm always drawn to music that has heart and emotion. I'm not sure what creates the feeling of human intimacy/closeness in the work I do…whether it's the closeness of the microphones or something else I'm not sure. But I do know that I can feel the human who made the music when I listen back to the music. I don't know if that's the same experience that listeners have if they've never met the artist, but I think it must be similar. The reception of music is always based on the listener’s experiences as much as the music itself or the intention of the artist, so in that sense a lot of the “value” of music is created by the listener. As long as we are emotional creatures, we will have need for emotional music, and I'll be working on making it for as long as I'm able. AV: We’d like to extend our sincere thanks to Tom Eaton for taking the time to share his thoughts and experiences with Ambient Visions. Conversations like this don’t just happen—they come from a willingness to slow down, reflect, and offer something meaningful, and Tom has done exactly that here. His openness in discussing the often unseen work behind the music gives us all a deeper appreciation for the care, patience, and intuition that go into shaping the recordings we hold close. It’s been a true pleasure to spend some time in that space between sound and silence with him. We’re grateful for his generosity and insight, and we look forward to hearing where his path leads next—both in his own work and in the many projects he helps bring to life. Our thanks again, and our very best wishes to Tom in all that lies ahead. |